War Crimes What are the Claims and What Effect Will It have on the US ?

THERE ARE A NUMBER OF LAW SUITS FILED AGAINST
PRESIDENT BUSH, BUT THERE ARE MORE COMING FROM IN AND
OUT OF THE NATION ABOUT WAR CRIMES WHAT IS GOING ON
AND WHY?



ARE THE ALLEGED HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS REAL?


December 6, 2004 The Lawyers Against the War, filed the following but it was blacked by the Canada Government....

Breakthrough in Canadian case to charge Bush with torture crimes
by Pen
Fri Oct 21, 2005 at 03:37:32 AM PDT

Click here for the full Story

WAR CRIMES CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
ARE THESE STORIES TRUTH?

This past Monday, a BC Supreme Court overturned the ban on publishing everything to do with the case in Canada being brought against George W. Bush Jr. for the crime of violating the 1987 U.N. Convention on Torture. Canada, along with 139 other nations, ratified the Convention, promising to protect the inalienable rights of all the world's citizens to a life free from torture. Gail Davidson and Lawyers Against the War (LAW) filed charges under sections of the Canadian Criminal Code enacted pursuant to the United Nations Torture Convention, which requires [b]extra-territorial jurisdiction to be exercised against officials, even Heads of State[/b], who authorize or oversee torture.

The charges brought against Bush accuse him of aiding, abetting, and counseling the commission of torture. These charges are based upon the abuses of the prisoners held at the U.S. prisons in Guantánamo and Abu-Ghraib, including Canadian minor Omar Khadr, who has been held in Cuba since 2001.

Gail Davidson and Lawyers Against the War (LAW) called this ruling "a major victory" in their attempts to put Bush on trial for these crimes.

Canada blocks torture charges against Bush the Canadian government used a claim of diplomatic immunity Monday to block torture charges laid under the Canadian Criminal Code against President George W. Bush. The charges had been laid by Gail Davidson of LAW [Lawyers against the War] on the occasion of Bush’s visit to Canada on November 30. They concerned the well-known abuses at Abu Ghraib prison, photos of which shocked the world earlier this year, as well as similar abuses at Guantánamo Bay that have emerged more recently. On behalf of LAW, Davidson was seeking to fix a date for a hearing into the charges and came armed with evidence, but Judge William Kitchen acceded to the Attorney General’s objections and declared the charges ‘a nullity’.

“Of course, they’re not a nullity”, said Professor Michael Mandel, co-chair of LAW, who criticized the decision as “irregular in procedure and wrong in substance.” “These charges were properly laid and backed up by powerful evidence. The government didn’t deny that evidence because it couldn’t deny it. Diplomatic immunity is purely procedural. It doesn’t affect the validity of the charges, only whether they can be proceeded with, for the time being, in a foreign court, in this case a Canadian court. Even if Bush has immunity, it’s only temporary and it won’t shield him or anyone in his administration from Canadian law, or any other law, when they leave office. That the Canadian government would try to hush this up by hiding Bush behind diplomatic immunity was only to be expected. Paul Martin invited Bush here to ingratiate himself with the President, despite the President’s crimes against our laws and against international law, despite even his inadmissibility as a war criminal under Canada’s immigration laws – above all, despite the unending human disaster the President’s illegal ‘war of choice’ has brought to the people of Iraq.”


Vancouver lawyer Gail Davidson, who laid the charges, said “We have a lot of objections to the way these charges were handled. We can’t see the legal basis for sealing the courtroom and excluding the press and the public. We think the claim of immunity was premature and exaggerated, and the quashing of the charges not authorized by the law. We are considering our options, including an appeal of the decision. One thing we will do for sure is to pursue similar charges in Germany as part of the prosecution launched there by the American Center for Constitutional Rights. There is good reason to believe that the German authorities will show more backbone than the government of Canada in the face of the Bush administration’s trashing of international human rights law.”

Lawsuit Filed in U.S. District Court in Reno Against George W. Bush and Richard B. Cheney

WASHINGTON -- January 18 -- A lawsuit was filed late Friday January 14th in the U.S. District Court in Reno, Nevada against President Bush and Vice President Cheney. The lawsuit alleges that both defendants have acted outside the scope of their job description in waging a war against Iraq. The complaint alleges that both defendants and others working within the White House and Defense Department have covertly implemented a white paper called “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” as presented by the Project for the New American Century or PNAC in September, 2000 two months before the murky elections of that year. Among the persons signing the paper were Richard Cheney and Jeb Bush. While the paper was published on the internet, implementation of it by the White House has been in secret.

Doug Wallace Files as Well

Founders Freedom Defense Fund

Lawsuit Filed in U.S. District Court in Reno Against George W. Bush and Richard B. Cheney

WASHINGTON -- January 18 -- A lawsuit was filed late Friday January 14th in the U.S. District Court in Reno, Nevada against President Bush and Vice President Cheney. The lawsuit alleges that both defendants have acted outside the scope of their job description in waging a war against Iraq. The complaint alleges that both defendants and others working within the White House and Defense Department have covertly implemented a white paper called “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” as presented by the Project for the New American Century or PNAC in September, 2000 two months before the murky elections of that year. Among the persons signing the paper were Richard Cheney and Jeb Bush. While the paper was published on the internet, implementation of it by the White House has been in secret.

Click Here For the Full Story

D'Anne Burley - Talk Show Host Producer featured on truthradio.com and Radal International Radio Network, Activist, Investigator - Filed Acts of Treason With Illinois in January 2004.

The filed document was written by Alfred Webre, International Lawyer but it seems in Illinois No one will involved themselves in a Issue that has impacted on the world.

Senators - They just refuse to do anything about it...... She receives a form letter From Senator Dick Durbin relating to Impeachment and nothing else... Why?

This Was Submited in January of 2004 and not one of Illinois Senators Acted on it Why?

====Submitted to US Senate on Thursday and was sent across the World!===== ===Joint Res. _______ 109th CONGRESS ____ Session Joint Res. _______

To appoint an Independent Prosecutor under the authority of Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute Treason against these United States of America by George Walker Bush, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Richard B. Myers and other John and Jane Does in planning and carrying out the acts of treason in an armed attack upon these United States on September 11, 2001, in the guise of a strategic deception operation. JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE U.S. SENATE & HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Date: ____________________ Sen. ________________________ and Rep. ____________________________________ introduced the following Joint Resolution of the Congress of the United States A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE U.S. SENATE & HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESTo appoint an Independent Prosecutor under the authority of Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute Treason against these United States of America by George Walker Bush, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Richard B. Myers and other John and Jane Does in planning and carrying out the acts of treason in an armed attack upon these United States on September 11, 2001, in the guise of a strategic deception operation.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,WHEREAS, the attacks upon the Pentagon and the World Trade Center of September 11, 2001 were a strategic deception operation of the US Administration, carried out by US Government Aircraft and Missiles, under the direct orders of President George Walker Bush, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Richard Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and WHEREAS, the goals of the strategic deception operation of September 11, 2001 included providing a pretext for the unilateral abrogation of the ABM Treaty (announced by George Walker Bush on June 13, 2002) and for the weaponization of space; for the abrogation of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution; and for the launching of illegal wars of aggression in violation of international law.WHEREAS, There is a sufficient legal threshold of evidence to issue an indictment for the crime of Treason against these individuals under the US Constitution, which in Article III(3) provides: "Sect. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on open confession in open court." SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the `The 911 Independent Prosecutor Act'.SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL PROHIBITION AGAINST TREASON AGAINST THESE UNITED STATES. Congress reaffirms the prohibition under the US Constitution, which in Article III(3) provides: "Sect. 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on open confession in open court." SEC. 3. APPOINTMENT AND FUNDING OF A 9/11 INDEPENDENT PROSECUTORCongress hereby appoints and fully funds an Independent Prosecutor under the authority of Article III(3) of the U.S. Constitution to prosecute Treason against these United States of America by George Walker Bush, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Richard B. Myers and other John and Jane Does in planning and carrying out the acts of treason in an armed attack upon these United States on September 11, 2001, in the guise of a strategic deception operation.SEC. 4. REPORTS The 9/11 Independent Prosecutor shall submit public progress reports to the Congress every 90 days. END